Congressional Record: July 21, 2004 (Senate)
Page S8537-S8538]
NEED FOR THE INDEPENDENT NATIONAL SECURITY CLASSIFICATION BOARD
Mr. GRAHAM of Florida. Madam President, I am delighted to join my
colleagues Senator Wyden, Senator Lott and Senator Snowe in introducing
a bipartisan bill that will begin to address our Government's dangerous
tendency toward excessive secrecy.
I start from the belief that, in our democratic society, the people
should have access to all information which their Government holds in
their behalf. The only exceptions should be for necessary personal and
company privacy concerns, such as tax returns, and for
[[Page S8538]]
legitimate national security threats, such as protecting the sources
and methods of gathering extremely sensitive information. The current
level of abuse of our classification system is so egregious as to be
laughable.
To make matters worse, when the Congress has sought to declassify
important information, we have allowed the fox to guard the henhouse--
we have allowed the CIA and other agencies to determine what gets
released to the American public from reports that are critical of their
conduct.
I am personally most familiar with the report of the House and Senate
Intelligence Committees' Joint Inquiry into the intelligence failures
surrounding 9/11. After our report was filed in December 2002, it took
7 months to get a declassified version that we could release. And after
all those months, the intelligence agencies and the White House refused
to declassify pages and pages of information that might have caused
them embarrassment--but certainly did not threaten our national
security.
The most famous instance of censorship is the 27 pages that detail
foreign sources of support of two of the 19 hijackers while they were
living among us and finalizing their evil plot. For all we know, that
pattern of support continues to this day. But our report found a number
of instances where failures to share information were in and of
themselves threats to national security.
Had Federal agencies' watch lists of terrorist suspects been shared,
especially with State and local law enforcement officials, police might
have detained prior to 9/11 several of the hijackers when they were
stopped for traffic offenses. We also have learned that the President's
Daily Brief of August 6, 2001, listed a number of pending threats to
our homeland, including hijackings of commercial aircraft. If only that
information had been shared with the airlines through the FAA, the
airlines could have heightened security on board aircraft and more
thoroughly screened their passenger lists. Instead, no steps were
taken.
One of the Joint Inquiry's recommendations, No. 15, called on the
President and the intelligence agencies to review executive orders,
policies and procedures that govern national security classification of
intelligence information:
in an effort to expand access to relevant information for
Federal agencies outside the Intelligence Community, for
State and local authorities, which are critical to the fight
against terrorism, and for the American public.
The recommendation also called on Congress to review statutes,
policies and procedures governing classification. As the recommendation
states:
Among other matters, Congress should consider the degree to
which excessive classification has been used in the past and
the extent to which the emerging threat environment has
greatly increased the need for real-time sharing of sensitive
information.
The report called on the Director of Central Intelligence, the
Attorney General, the Secretary of Defense, the Secretary of Homeland
Security and the Secretary of State to review and report to the House
and Senate committees with ``proposals to protect against the use of
the classification process as a shield to protect agency self-
interest.''
Regrettably, none of the executive branch agencies have responded to
the Joint Inquiry's directives on this issue. So I am pleased to join
my colleagues in cosponsoring this legislation, which will create an
Independent National Security Classification Board within the executive
branch to force the administration and the intelligence agencies to
respond and to implement new procedures and standards. Once a new
classification system has been adopted, the independent board will have
access to all documents that are classified on the basis of national
security concerns and the authority to review classification decisions
made by executive branch employees. If the board disagrees with a
decision, it can make a recommendation to the President to reverse or
alter the classification.
If the President doesn't adopt the board's recommendation, he must
within 60 days explain his decision to Congress:
and post such notification and written justification on the
White House website.
This will, at the very least, let the American people know that they
are being denied information.
____________________