Congressional Record: July 21, 2004 (Senate) Page S8537-S8538] NEED FOR THE INDEPENDENT NATIONAL SECURITY CLASSIFICATION BOARD Mr. GRAHAM of Florida. Madam President, I am delighted to join my colleagues Senator Wyden, Senator Lott and Senator Snowe in introducing a bipartisan bill that will begin to address our Government's dangerous tendency toward excessive secrecy. I start from the belief that, in our democratic society, the people should have access to all information which their Government holds in their behalf. The only exceptions should be for necessary personal and company privacy concerns, such as tax returns, and for [[Page S8538]] legitimate national security threats, such as protecting the sources and methods of gathering extremely sensitive information. The current level of abuse of our classification system is so egregious as to be laughable. To make matters worse, when the Congress has sought to declassify important information, we have allowed the fox to guard the henhouse-- we have allowed the CIA and other agencies to determine what gets released to the American public from reports that are critical of their conduct. I am personally most familiar with the report of the House and Senate Intelligence Committees' Joint Inquiry into the intelligence failures surrounding 9/11. After our report was filed in December 2002, it took 7 months to get a declassified version that we could release. And after all those months, the intelligence agencies and the White House refused to declassify pages and pages of information that might have caused them embarrassment--but certainly did not threaten our national security. The most famous instance of censorship is the 27 pages that detail foreign sources of support of two of the 19 hijackers while they were living among us and finalizing their evil plot. For all we know, that pattern of support continues to this day. But our report found a number of instances where failures to share information were in and of themselves threats to national security. Had Federal agencies' watch lists of terrorist suspects been shared, especially with State and local law enforcement officials, police might have detained prior to 9/11 several of the hijackers when they were stopped for traffic offenses. We also have learned that the President's Daily Brief of August 6, 2001, listed a number of pending threats to our homeland, including hijackings of commercial aircraft. If only that information had been shared with the airlines through the FAA, the airlines could have heightened security on board aircraft and more thoroughly screened their passenger lists. Instead, no steps were taken. One of the Joint Inquiry's recommendations, No. 15, called on the President and the intelligence agencies to review executive orders, policies and procedures that govern national security classification of intelligence information: in an effort to expand access to relevant information for Federal agencies outside the Intelligence Community, for State and local authorities, which are critical to the fight against terrorism, and for the American public. The recommendation also called on Congress to review statutes, policies and procedures governing classification. As the recommendation states: Among other matters, Congress should consider the degree to which excessive classification has been used in the past and the extent to which the emerging threat environment has greatly increased the need for real-time sharing of sensitive information. The report called on the Director of Central Intelligence, the Attorney General, the Secretary of Defense, the Secretary of Homeland Security and the Secretary of State to review and report to the House and Senate committees with ``proposals to protect against the use of the classification process as a shield to protect agency self- interest.'' Regrettably, none of the executive branch agencies have responded to the Joint Inquiry's directives on this issue. So I am pleased to join my colleagues in cosponsoring this legislation, which will create an Independent National Security Classification Board within the executive branch to force the administration and the intelligence agencies to respond and to implement new procedures and standards. Once a new classification system has been adopted, the independent board will have access to all documents that are classified on the basis of national security concerns and the authority to review classification decisions made by executive branch employees. If the board disagrees with a decision, it can make a recommendation to the President to reverse or alter the classification. If the President doesn't adopt the board's recommendation, he must within 60 days explain his decision to Congress: and post such notification and written justification on the White House website. This will, at the very least, let the American people know that they are being denied information. ____________________