PROPOSED LEGISLATION TO AMEND THE RADIATION
|
TABLE 1- A Minimum Radiation Exposure Levels for Full Compensation for Lung Cancer (in Working LevelMonths) Nonsmokers | |||
Age at disease incidence |
Years since last radon progeny exposure |
||
<10 | 10-19 | >-20 | |
<50 50- 59 60- 69 >-70 |
1 4 16 24 |
2 8 45 50 |
9 33 141 203 |
TABLE 1- B Minimum Radiation Exposure Levels for Full Compensation for Lung Cancer (in Working Level Months) Smokers | |||
Age at disease incidence |
Years since last radon progeny exposure |
||
<10 | 10-19 | >-20 | |
<50 50- 59 60- 69 >-70 |
5 19 81 117 |
11 40 174 250 |
46 163 703 1,010 |
TABLE 2- A Minimum Duration of Employment for Full Compensation For Lung Cancer (in Years) Nonsmokers | |||
Age at disease incidence |
Years since last radon progeny exposure | ||
<10 | 10-19 | >-20 | |
First exposed: <1955 | |||
<50 50- 59 60- 69 >-70 |
0.0a 0.1 0.5 0.7 |
0.0 0.2 0.7 1.1 |
0.0 0.3 1.5 2.4 |
First exposed:1955-59 | |||
<50 50- 59 60- 69 >-70 |
0.0 0.1 0.6 0.9 |
0.0 0.2 0.9 1.4 |
0.0 0.3 1.9 3.0 |
First exposed: >-1960 | |||
<50 50- 59 60- 69 >-70 |
0.0 0.3 1.6 2.5 |
0.0 0.4 2.4 3.8 |
0.1 0.8 5.0 8.0 |
a A value of 0.0 years denotes employment in an underground uranium mine for
at least 1 day but less than 18 days (. 05 years or 102 working hours). |
TABLE 2- B Minimum Duration of Employment For Full Compensation for Lung Cancer (in Years) Smokers | |||
Age at disease incidence |
Years since last radon progeny exposure | ||
<10 | 10-19 | >-20 | |
First exposed: <1955 | |||
<50 50- 59 60- 69 >-70 |
0.0a 0.2 1.1 1.7 |
0.0 0.3 1.6 2.6 |
0.0 0.6 3.4 5.5 |
First exposed:1955-59 | |||
<50 50- 59 60- 69 >-70 |
0.0 0.2 1.4 2.2 |
0.0 0.4 2.1 3.3 |
0.1 0.7 4.3 7.0 |
First exposed: >-1960 | |||
<50 50- 59 60- 69 >-70 |
0.0 0.6 3.6 5.8 |
0.1 0.9 5.5 8.8 |
0.1 1.9 11.5 18.5 |
a A value of 0.0 years denotes employment in an underground uranium mine for at least 1 day but less than 18 days (. 05 years or 102 working hours). |
TABLE 3- A Minimum Radiation Exposure Levels For Partial Compensation For Lung Cancer (in Working Level Months) Nonsmokers | |||
Age at disease incidence |
Years since last radon progeny exposure |
||
<10 | 10-19 | >-20 | |
<50 50- 59 60- 69 >-70 |
0.4 1 5 9 |
0.7 3 16 18 |
3 12 50 72 |
TABLE 3- B Minimum Radiation Exposure Levels For Partial Compensation For Lung Cancer (in Working Level Months) Smokers | |||
Age at disease incidence |
Years since last radon progeny exposure |
||
<10 | 10-19 | >-20 | |
<50 50- 59 60- 69 >-70 |
2 7 29 41 |
4 14 61 88 |
16 57 248 356 |
"( f) Definitions ; For purposes of this section ;"( 1) the term 'working level month of radon progeny' means exposure to radon progeny at the level of one working level every work day for a month, or an equivalent exposure over a greater or lesser amount of time;(c) DETERMINATION AND PAYMENT OF CLAIMS.
"( 2) the term 'working level' means the concentration of the short half- life daughters of radon that will release 1.3 x 10 5 million electron volts of alpha energy per liter of air;
"( 3) the term 'nonmalignant respiratory disease' means either pulmonary fibrosis,
cor pulmonale related to pulmonary fibrosis, or moderate or severe silicosis, or pneumoconiosis;
"( 4) the term 'Indian tribe' means any Indian tribe, band, nation, pueblo, or other organized group or community, that is recognized as eligible for special programs and services provided by the United States to Indian tribes because of their status as Indians.
"( 5) the term 'specified State' means
Arizona, Colorado, New Mexico, Utah, or Wyoming; and
"( 6) the term 'designated time period' means the period beginning January 1, 1947 and ending on December 31, 1971."
(1) Section 6( c)( 2)( A)( ii) of the Act is amended by
striking "5( a)" and inserting "5( f)( 6)".
(2) Section 6( c)( 2)( B) of the Act is amended;(A) in clause (I) by inserting "( other than a claim
for workers compensation)" after "claim"; and
(B) in clause (ii) by striking "Federal Govern-ment"
and inserting "Department of Veteran
Affairs."
(3) Section 6( d) of the Act is amended by inserting at the
end the following:
"The Attorney General may request from any claimant,
or from any individual or entity on behalf of any claim-ant,
any additional information or documentation neces-sary
to complete the determination on the claim in
accordance with the procedures established under sub-section
(a). The period of time from the Attorney
General's request for additional information or documen-tation
until the time such information or documentation
is provided or the requested party informs the Attorney
General the information or documentation cannot or will
not be provided, is not counted toward the 12- month
limit established in this subsection."
SECTION- BY- SECTION ANALYSISSection (1). This section would state the short title of the bill.
Section (2). This section would amend sections 4, 5, and 6 of the Radiation
Exposure Compensation Act of 1990, P. L. 101- 426, 42 Subsection (a). This section would amend section 4 of the Act by expanding the eligibility criteria for downwinder and onsite partici-pant claimants. Subsection (1) would amend section 4( a)( 1) of the Act by expanding the class of claimants eligible for compensation for childhood leukemia to include certain onsite participants. The amend-ment would add individuals who were exposed to radiation before the age of 21 while participating onsite in a test involving the atmospheric detonation of a nuclear device. Subsection (2) would amend the list of compensable diseases in section 4( b) of the Act to account for the latest scientific findings regarding the effects of radiation exposure. The amendment would add two new diseases that have now been associated with expo-sure to radiation ; primary cancers of the male breast and salivary gland ; and eliminate the requirement that claimants seeking compen-sation for pancreatic cancer not have a history of heavy coffee drinking. The bill would limit compensation for salivary gland cancer to claim-ants who were not heavy smokers. Subsection (b). This section would amend section 5 of the Act, defining the eligibility criteria for uranium miner claimants. This section would delete the present exposure- based eligibility criteria that apply to all uranium miner claimants ; whether they are seeking compensation for lung cancer or a nonmalignant respiratory disease ; and substitute in lieu thereof separate, and in the case of lung cancer, new eligibility criteria for each compensable disease. This section would further modify section 5 of the Act by adding provisions stating new eligibility criteria for partial compensation for lung cancer. This section would amend section 5(a) of the Act by deleting the eligibility criteria for nonmalignant diseases, and adding to the existing exposure- based criteria for lung cancer two additional sets of criteria ; one set also based on exposure to radiation, and a second set based on duration of employment ; and allow claimants to qualify for full compensation ($ 100,000) by meeting either the existing criteria or either of the two new alternative sets of criteria. These new sets of standards are the result of an effort by the Administration to generate new compensation criteria that more accurately reflect the risk of lung cancer from uranium mining, and thus better provide compensation to deserving claimants. The new criteria are based on the latest data and an updated analysis of the risk factors for lung cancer from uranium mining; they represent the best estimate of the level of radiation at which the miner's exposure (measured either directly by working level months or indirectly by duration of employment) is the probable cause of his lung cancer. The set of criteria based on duration of employment are proposed because potential claimants are likely to find them easier to understand and use than exposure- based alternative criteria. This section would also delete the existing subsection (b), which defines a number of terms used in section 5 of the Act, and substitute in lieu thereof a new set of eligibility criteria thatwould provide partial compensation ($ 50,000) to a class of miner- claimants who are not qualified under the present criteria and who will not qualify under the newly proposed criteria for full compensation. The new criteria in section 5( b) are based on the same data and analysis as the newly-proposed criteria for full compensation, but, additionally, give the miner- claimants the benefit of known uncertainties in the underlying data. Thus, section 5( b), as amended, would newly enfranchise those miner- claimants whose exposure to radiation we can confidently say, giving them the benefit of known uncertainties in the underlying data, caused their lung cancers. This section would, further, add a new subsection (c) that re-states separately the present eligibility criteria for full compensation for nonmalignant respiratory diseases. This section would also add a new subsection (d) that would restate the requirements presently found in section 5( a) of the Act that the compensation can be paid only when a claim is filed with the Attor-ney General, determined to meet the requirements of the Act, and payment can be made in accordance with the provisions of section 6 of the Act. This section would add a new subsection (e) that would incorpo-rate into the Act tables containing the new eligibility criteria for lung cancer, for both full and partial compensation. Table 1 contains the new, alternative exposure- based eligibility criteria for full compensa-tion; Table 2 contains the new, alternative employment- based eligibility criteria for full compensation; and Table 3 contains the new exposure-based eligibility criteria for partial compensation. Finally, this section would add a new subsection (f) that would restate the definitions presently found in section 5( b) of the Act, with some additions and modifications. The definition of the term "nonma-lignant respiratory disease" in section 5( b)( 3) of the existing Act would be modified by eliminating the redundant reference to pulmonary fibrosis in the list of compensable nonmalignant respiratory disorders, and by eliminating the limitation on compensation for silicosis and pneumoconiosis to uranium mines on Indian Reservations. This latter modification would ensure that miners employed in uranium mines off Indian Reservations (yet within one of the specified mining States) are compensated on the same conditions as miners employed in mines on Indian Reservations; the evidence suggests that the risk of silicosis due to uranium mining was not restricted to mines on Indian Reservations. The proposed subsection (f) would also include definitions of two new terms ; "specified States" and "designated time period" ; employed in the proposed amendments to section 5.
Section (c). This section would amend the provisions of section 6( c)( 2) of the Act defining the circumstances in which awards to onsite participants must be offset by payments received from other parties. Subsection (1) would amend section 6( c)( 2)( A)( ii) by substituting for the existing reference the new subsection where the designated time period within which a claimant must have been em-ployed in a uranium mine is defined. Subsection (2) would amend section 6( c)( 2)( B)( I) to clarify that awards under the Act to on- site participants should not be offset by payments to the claimant based on a worker's compensation claim for the same injuries. It would also amend section 6( c)( 2)( B)( ii) to clarify that an award under the Act should be offset only by payments to the claimant from the Department of Veteran's Affairs, and not by disability payments from other Federal agencies, such as Social Secu-rity. These amendments are designed to enhance parity among the eligible populations by ensuring that payments to onsite participants are offset on the same terms as payments to downwinders and uranium miners. Subsection (3) would amend section 6( d) of the Act by adding explicit authorization for the Attorney General to seek and obtain from claimants, or from any individual or private or public entity on behalf of claimants, any documentation or information necessary to determine eligibility. This section also provides that the time period during which the Attorney General is awaiting the requested information shall not count toward the 12- month statutory limit on processing claims. |