FAS | Government Secrecy | February 2000 News ||| Index | Search | Join FAS


The Washington Post
February 1, 2000

Back Channels: The Intelligence Community

By Vernon Loeb
Washington Post Staff Writer

[...]

Sensitive Definition

In its zeal to crack down on Chinese espionage last year at the Department of Energy's nuclear weapons laboratories, Congress passed legislation creating fines of up to $100,000 for anyone mishandling classified or "sensitive information."

There's only one problem: There's no such thing as "sensitive information" under the Atomic Energy Act. So says Mary Anne Sullivan, DOE's general counsel, who issued a memo to department heads and lab directors last month stating that the new fines won't be imposed until the term "sensitive information" is defined.

"So, in order to justify the new penalty," said the Federation of American Scientists' Steven Aftergood, "a new crime will have to be created."




FAS | Government Secrecy | February 2000 News ||| Index | Search | Join FAS