SECRECY NEWS
from the FAS Project on Government Secrecy
Volume 2006, Issue No. 84
July 28, 2006Secrecy News Blog: http://www.fas.org/blog/secrecy/
Support Secrecy News: http://www.fas.org/static/contrib_sec.jsp
- TWO REPORTS DETAIL HALTING PROGRESS ON INTEL REFORM
- SEEKING RECIPROCITY IN SECURITY CLEARANCE POLICY
- HOUSE HEARING ON FOIA POLICY
- DOD MANUAL ON TECHNICAL INTELLIGENCE
TWO REPORTS DETAIL HALTING PROGRESS ON INTEL REFORM
Some intriguing new details of U.S. intelligence policy were disclosed in two reports on the implementation of the Intelligence Reform Act of 2004 that were issued yesterday by the House Intelligence Committee and by the Director of National Intelligence.
Beyond broad conclusions on the status of intelligence reform, each report voiced numerous passing observations of interest, both favorable and critical. The report of the House Intelligence Committee noted the following, for example:The report also provided new information on developments in intelligence analysis, intelligence reform at the FBI, the production of the President's Daily Brief, and more. See the full report of the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence Subcommittee on Oversight here:
- "Many of the major acquisition programs at the National Reconnaissance Office, the National Security Agency, and the National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency have cost taxpayers billions of dollars in cost overruns and schedule delays." (p. 14)
- "The National Intelligence Council is... making more use of external experts from academia and think tanks to prepare certain parts of a National Intelligence Estimate." (p. 16)
- "The National Counterterrorism Center ... advised that out of the universe of information available on terrorist targets, the National Counterterrorism Center, the CIA's Counterterrorism Center and the Defense Intelligence Agency's Joint Intelligence Task Force - Counterterrorism were all analyzing approximately the same ten percent." (p. 17)
- A newly established Analytic Resources Catalog provides "the names and other identifying information such as home agency and areas of expertise for all analysts in the Community." (p. 19) The DNI report added that "The Catalog contains information on 17,000 IC analysts throughout the IC, including current assignment, professional experience, academic background, language ability, and other biographical information." (DNI, p. 5)
- "We are concerned that individuals with [key] skill sets are not being hired because they may not conform to current hiring policy and standards. Subcommittee members and staff heard startling accounts of very qualified applicants being turned away because their diverse backgrounds do not permit them to successfully complete the rigid and antiquated applicant processing model of a 'Cold War' era." (p. 24)
- "The Open Source Center is in the midst of a major acquisition for a large-scale internet exploitation capability.... So far this year, there has been a significant increase in open source entries that have been included in the President's Daily Brief." (p. 34)
http://www.fas.org/irp/congress/2006_rpt/hpsci072706.pdf
The report of the Director of National Intelligence addressed many of the same topics, though without the criticism or frustration expressed in the House report, and with some additional details.
For example, the DNI has established what sounds like a knock-off of the JASON defense advisory group:And changes to national security classification policy in intelligence may be on the horizon:
- "One new ODNI-sponsored external outreach event is the Summer Hard Problem Initiative, a series of intensive summer studies that will bring together outside experts to address challenging analytic problems." (p. 5)
See the full DNI report here:
- "Several new ODNI classification policies are currently in the final stages of review, but more significant shifts may be required. If so, the DNI's classification and declassification authorities may require strengthening. The ODNI is currently engaged with the NSC in examining the possibility of broader change." (p. 8)
http://www.fas.org/irp/dni/prog072706.pdf
SEEKING RECIPROCITY IN SECURITY CLEARANCE POLICY
Reciprocity in security clearances -- meaning the acceptance by one agency of a security clearance granted by another agency, and vice versa -- has been an elusive security policy goal for well over a decade. But lately it has become the subject of increased attention.
"The Director [of National Intelligence] has done little to ensure the reciprocal recognition of security clearances within the [Intelligence] Community," the House Intelligence Committee complained in its new report. "It def[ies] common sense... that it takes months to transfer clearances for an individual who will work in the exact same space but transfer from the National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency to the CIA," the House report said. A July 17 memo from the Office of Management and Budget addresses the problem of reciprocity in highly restricted "special access programs," and provides a checklist of permitted exceptions to reciprocity. See:http://www.fas.org/sgp/othergov/reciprocal071706.pdf
The Department of Defense and Department of Energy have each issued new directives lately on reciprocal recognition of security clearances.
The Freedom of Information Act "continues to be a valuable tool for citizens to obtain information about the operation and decisions of the federal government," the Government Accountability Office reported at a July 26 House hearing.
"Since 2002, agencies have received increasing numbers of requests and have also continued to increase the number of requests that they process. In addition, agencies continue to grant most requests in full. However, the rate of increase in pending requests is accelerating," the GAO concluded in its testimony, which provided substantial new data on individual agency FOIA practices. Critical assessments of FOIA policy were also presented by Patrice McDermott of OpenTheGovernment.org and by Tonda Rush of the Sunshine in Government Initiative. Dan Metcalfe presented the viewpoint of the Department of Justice at the hearing, which also featured Senator Patrick Leahy, Sen. John Cornyn, and Rep. Brad Sherman. See the prepared statements from "Implementing FOIA-- Does the Bush Administration's Executive Order Improve Processing?" hearing before the Subcommittee on Government Management of the House Government Reform Committee, July 26:http://www.fas.org/sgp/congress/2006/index.html#foia
On July 24, a federal court told the National Reconnaissance Office that it could not use the "operational files" exemption to withhold its Congressional Budget Justification Book from processing under the FOIA (Secrecy News, 7/25/06).
But on July 25, the National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency denied a FOIA request for a copy of its Congressional Budget Justification Book. Why? Because, NGA said, it is an "operational file" that is exempt from FOIA processing. Sigh. An appeal was filed explaining that this claim has been found unlawful. And see, relatedly, "Judge: Spy satellite budget can be FOIA-ed," by Shaun Waterman, United Press International, July 27:http://www.upi.com/SecurityTerrorism/view.php?StoryID=20060727-081417-7610r
DOD MANUAL ON TECHNICAL INTELLIGENCE
The Department of Defense has published a new manual on the conduct of "technical intelligence" operations, or TECHINT.
Technical intelligence here refers to the collection, analysis and exploitation of captured enemy materiel and documentation. TECHINT serves to maintain U.S. technological advantage on the battlefield and helps to counter adversary weapons systems and operations. TECHINT roles and missions are described in a new inter-service manual. A copy was obtained by Secrecy News. See "TECHINT: Multi-Service Tactics, Techniques, and Procedures for Technical Intelligence Operations," FM 2-22.401, 9 June 2006:http://www.fas.org/irp/doddir/army/fm2-22-401.pdf
******************************
Secrecy News is written by Steven Aftergood and published by the Federation of American Scientists.
The Secrecy News blog is at:
http://www.fas.org/blog/secrecy/To SUBSCRIBE to Secrecy News, send an email message to secrecy_news-request@lists.fas.org with "subscribe" (without quotes) in the body of the message.
To UNSUBSCRIBE, send a blank email message to secrecy_news-remove@lists.fas.org.
OR email your request to saftergood@fas.org
Secrecy News is archived at:
http://www.fas.org/sgp/news/secrecy/index.htmlSUPPORT Secrecy News with a donation here:
http://www.fas.org/static/contrib_sec.jsp