from the FAS Project on Government Secrecy
Volume 2011, Issue No. 48
May 19, 2011

Secrecy News Blog:


Prosecutors in the case of Jeffrey A. Sterling, a former CIA officer who is accused of leaking classified information to the press, asked a court this week to provide 50 blank subpoenas requiring testimony at a September 12 hearing in the case. The intended recipients were not identified.

"50 subpoenas seems like a hell of a lot," said an attorney who has been an observer of the case. "I know who some of the witnesses likely could be, but it doesn't amount to 50! Of course, [the subpoenas] could also be used for documents."

Last week prosecutors also filed a mysterious motion to depose an unidentified prospective witness. After the sealed motion was filed on May 12, the court issued an order affirming that it was "sufficiently sensitive that it should not be part of the public record." However, Judge Leonie M. Brinkema added that "there is no reason why defendant or defense counsel should be prevented from viewing [it]."

Yesterday, the government abruptly withdrew the motion. No explanation was offered on the record.

The fact that the judge used the term "sensitive" to describe the motion and that at the same time she deemed it appropriate to share with the defendant and his counsel suggests that it was not classified and that its sensitivity was attributable to some other factor. But what?

One immediately thinks of the possibility of a deposition directed at the press, and specifically at New York Times reporter James Risen, with whom Mr. Sterling is alleged to have had a confidential source relationship.

But "I doubt it is a subpoena for the media," said the observer. "Why would the government have any more success with that for trial than it did pre-trial?" An earlier subpoena to Mr. Risen was quashed last year by Judge Brinkema, as reported in Politico.

The prospective witness "could also be someone who they anticipate will be unavailable in September (perhaps overseas) or is seriously ill and perhaps is not expected to be around for the trial," the observer said.

At an April 8 hearing in the case, prosecutor William M. Welch alluded to "potential witness issues" that could make it impossible to proceed with the case, the Associated Press reported. No details of such issues were provided.


"Increasing awareness of the power of DNA to solve crimes has resulted in increased demand for DNA analysis," according to a new report from the Congressional Research Service, "which has resulted in a backlog of casework."

"Some jurisdictions have started to use their DNA databases for familial searching, which involves using offender profiles to identify relatives who might be perpetrators of crimes," the report said See "DNA Testing in Criminal Justice: Background, Current Law, Grants, and Issues," May 2, 2011:

Other new CRS reports include "The Global Challenge of HIV/AIDS, Tuberculosis, and Malaria," May 3, 2011:

and "U.S. Global Food Security Funding, FY2010-FY2012," April 28, 2011:


Secrecy News is written by Steven Aftergood and published by the Federation of American Scientists.

The Secrecy News blog is at:

To SUBSCRIBE to Secrecy News, go to:


OR email your request to

Secrecy News is archived at:

SUPPORT the FAS Project on Government Secrecy with a donation here: