SECRECY NEWS
from the FAS Project on Government Secrecy
Volume 2013, Issue No. 88
October 15, 2013Secrecy News Blog: http://blogs.fas.org/secrecy/
DEPT OF DEFENSE TO REPORT ON "AUTHORIZED LEAKS"
A new Department of Defense directive requires the Pentagon to notify Congress whenever a DoD official discloses classified intelligence to a reporter on an authorized basis, or declassifies the information specifically for release to the press.
The new directive on "Congressional Notification for Authorized Public Disclosure of Intelligence Information" applies to all components of the Department of Defense. It was issued last week -- despite the government shutdown -- in response to a provision in the FY2013 Intelligence Authorization Act (section 504) that was passed by Congress last year as part of an effort to stem leaks of classified information.
http://www.fas.org/irp/doddir/dod/dtm-13-009.pdf
The Senate Intelligence Committee explained then: "This provision is intended to ensure that the intelligence committees are made aware of authorized disclosures of national intelligence or intelligence related to national security that are made to media personnel or likely to appear in the press, so that, among other things, these authorized disclosures may be distinguished from unauthorized 'leaks'."
Notification to Congress is required whenever the intelligence that is disclosed "is currently classified or if it is declassified for the purpose of the disclosure," the directive states. The reporting requirement does not apply to regular declassification activities, or to releases under the Freedom of Information Act or through litigation.
The new requirement casts a spotlight on the anomalous category of authorized disclosures of classified information, which would normally be considered a contradiction in terms.
Although there is an allowance for emergency disclosures of classified information in order to address an imminent threat (section 4.2b of executive order 13526), there is no recognized authority for non-emergency disclosures of classified intelligence to the press or to anyone who does not hold a security clearance and who has not signed a non-disclosure agreement. (Perhaps a lawyerly reading of the executive order would say that the prohibition against unauthorized disclosures of classified information to an uncleared person does not apply if the disclosure is authorized!)
In any case, official disclosures of classified information to the press -- sometimes described as "authorized leaks" -- are known to occur with some regularity.
What is unclear is what impact, if any, the new DoD directive will have on daily interactions with the press. Will the Secretary of Defense actually file a report to Congress if he privately reveals a classified fact to a reporter? That's a little hard to imagine, though that's what the law demands. Or will the new reporting obligation instead serve to discourage authorized leaks to the press?
Because Congress imposed a one-year sunset on its new reporting requirement, the new DoD directive will expire on January 14, 2014, three months from now, unless it is renewed. It will be interesting to see if even a single report of an authorized disclosure of classified intelligence is filed by then.
New legislation to restore due process protections for federal employees who serve in "sensitive" positions was introduced last week by Rep. Eleanor Holmes Norton. Her bill was prompted by a widely criticized court ruling last August (in Kaplan v. Conyers and MSPB) that effectively stripped existing protections from such employees.
http://www.fas.org/irp/congress/2013_cr/norton-kaplan.html
The latest annual report from Openthegovernment.org examines the most recent indicators of secrecy in the federal government, noting continuing difficulty in curbing national security secrecy.
http://www.openthegovernment.org/node/4144
A new report from the Committee to Protect Journalists on "The Obama Administration and the Press" says that "government officials are increasingly afraid to talk to the press" due to invasive and punitive responses to unauthorized disclosures.
http://www.cpj.org/reports/2013/10/obama-and-the-press-us-leaks-surveillance-post-911.php
A new book on Lee Harvey Oswald's sojourn in the Soviet Union was reviewed by Priscilla Johnson McMillan in Max Holland's Washington Decoded. Ms. McMillan, author of the genuinely extraordinary 1977 volume Marina and Lee (reissued last summer), must be the only person ever to have known both JFK and Oswald. In her book review, she finds significant virtues and faults in the new book, The Interloper by Peter Savodnik.
http://www.washingtondecoded.com/site/2013/10/pilgrim.html
******************************
Secrecy News is written by Steven Aftergood and published by the Federation of American Scientists.
The Secrecy News blog is at:
http://blogs.fas.org/secrecy/To SUBSCRIBE to Secrecy News, go to:
http://blogs.fas.org/secrecy/subscribe/To UNSUBSCRIBE, go to:
http://blogs.fas.org/secrecy/unsubscribe/OR email your request to saftergood@fas.org
Secrecy News is archived at:
SUPPORT the FAS Project on Government Secrecy with a donation here:
http://www.fas.org/sgp/news/secrecy/index.html
https://members.fas.org/donate/