from the FAS Project on Government Secrecy
Volume 2013, Issue No. 97
November 12, 2013

Secrecy News Blog:


A bill that is intended to strengthen the ability of reporters to protect their confidential sources would encourage damaging leaks of classified information, congressional opponents argue.

The Free Flow of Information Act (S. 987) was approved by the Senate Judiciary Committee on September 12 by a vote of 13-5, and awaits further action by the full Senate. The Committee's report on the bill, which includes a lengthy dissent from several Republican Senators, was published late last week.

The Act would establish a "qualified" reporter's privilege whose application would be limited in several respects.

So, for example, the privilege would not apply to "information obtained as a result of the journalist's eyewitness observation of an alleged crime, or as a result of alleged criminal conduct by the journalist." However, the Act's protections would apply to leaks ("when the communication of the material is itself the alleged criminal conduct").

But even with respect to leaks, the privilege would not be absolute, and disclosure of confidential source information could be required by a court under some circumstances, including the prevention of terrorism.

"In cases that involve alleged unauthorized disclosures of properly classified information ('leaks'), the Act allows a court to compel the disclosure of confidential-source information where disclosure would assist in preventing or mitigating an act of terrorism or acts that are reasonably likely to cause significant and articulable harm to national security," the new Committee report explained.

The bill's limited scope of protection would "give generous berth for the Government to obtain the vital information that it needs in order to protect public safety," the Committee report said. "At the same time, these provisions prevent journalists from becoming the witnesses of choice in civil and criminal cases."

The Free Flow of Information Act has been criticized by some press freedom advocates because it presumes to define who is -- and who is not -- a covered journalist that is protected by the Act; or because it would actually validate official measures to compel disclosure of sources in some cases.

But neither these ambiguities nor the bill's cautiously even-handed approach were sufficient to reassure opponents on the Senate Committee, who insisted that the legislation would wrongly protect leakers and foster more leaks.

"Instead of making it easier for investigators and prosecutors to bring to justice those who would imperil our national security, the Committee has endorsed legislation that would do the exact opposite by explicitly protecting leakers of classified information and increasing the burden on those who seek to bring these leakers to justice," wrote Senators Jeff Sessions and John Cornyn in a dissenting statement appended to the Committee report.

"The cumulative effect of this burden would cripple the government's ability to identify and prosecute leakers of classified information, and in the process would encourage more leaks that threaten national security."

The bill "severely hinders the government's ability to identify the sources of leaked classified information," they complained. "Sources that hide behind journalists' promises of confidentiality in order to perpetrate wrongdoings, such as the leaking of classified information, will receive protection under S. 987."

In short, from the opponents' perspective, "This bill sets forth special standards that place protecting a leaker's identity ahead of the safety and security of the country."

"It is axiomatic that if Congress protects leakers of classified and other sensitive information by passing S. 987, what will result is more leaks of classified information."

"S. 987 will encourage leakers of classified or grand jury information to get away with clear violations of federal law, so long as the recipient of the information promises to keep the leaker's identity a secret."

"An individual who leaks classified or grand jury information commits a grievous crime and does not deserve the protection afforded by a journalist's successful assertion of privilege. If leakers of classified or grand jury information are protected under S. 987, we believe that more leaks will result and it will be harder to prosecute them," the dissenting Senators wrote.

Subpoena proceedings against reporter James Risen in the leak prosecution of former CIA officer Jeffrey Sterling have been stayed at Risen's request pending a petition on the matter to the U.S. Supreme Court.


The Department of Defense budget for research and procurement of unmanned aerial systems (UAS), or drones, is on a distinctly downward slope.

The FY 2014 budget request included $2.3 billion for research, development, and procurement of unmanned aerial systems, a decrease of $1.1 billion from the request for the fiscal year 2013.

"Annual procurement of UAS has gone from 1,211 in fiscal 2012 to 288 last year to just 54 in the proposed FY14 budget," according to a recently published congressional hearing volume.

See "Post Iraq and Afghanistan: Current and Future Roles for UAS and the Fiscal Year 2014 Budget Request," hearing before the House Armed Services Committee, April 23, 2013:

Among the questions for the record published in the new hearing volume, DoD officials were asked: "Who is responsible for developing privacy protections for military UAV operations inside the United States?"

Some other noteworthy new doctrinal and congressional defense-related publications include the following.

Joint Intelligence, Joint Publication 2-0, Joint Chiefs of Staff, October 22, 2013:

Civil-Military Engagement, ATP 3-57.80, US Army, October 2013:

Espionage Threats at Federal Laboratories: Balancing Scientific Cooperation While Protecting Critical Information, hearing before the House Science, Space and Technology Committee, May 16, 2013:

Budget Request for National Security Space Activities, House Armed Services Committee, April 25, 2013:

Text of the NATO Agreement for the Sharing of Atomic Energy Information (ATOMAL), As Amended, September 19, 2013:


We hope that all Secrecy News readers will give generously to charitable causes that help relieve those who are in distress, near and far.

But if you have something left over and you find our work interesting or useful for your own purposes, then we hope you may also contribute to Secrecy News and the FAS Project on Government Secrecy.

If your situation permits, please consider making a tax deductible contribution to the Federation of American Scientists to support Secrecy News. (Thanks to those who have already done so!)

Donations can be made online (specify that your donation should be directed to "government secrecy").

If contributing via Paypal or CFC (account number 11539), send us a separate email to let us know you want your contribution allocated to the FAS Project on Government Secrecy. Checks payable to FAS may also be mailed to:


Secrecy News is written by Steven Aftergood and published by the Federation of American Scientists.

The Secrecy News blog is at:

To SUBSCRIBE to Secrecy News, go to:


OR email your request to

Secrecy News is archived at:

SUPPORT the FAS Project on Government Secrecy with a donation here: