SECRECY NEWS
from the FAS Project on Government Secrecy
Volume 2015, Issue No. 56
September 1, 2015Secrecy News Blog: http://fas.org/blogs/secrecy/
A BASELINE FOR U.S. COUNTERINTELLIGENCE PROGRAMS
A 2013 Intelligence Community Directive that was released this week "establishes the baseline for CI [counterintelligence] programs across the Intelligence Community (IC)."
Counterintelligence is defined as "Information gathered and activities conducted to identify, deceive, exploit, disrupt, or protect against espionage, other intelligence activities, sabotage, or assassinations conducted for or on behalf of foreign powers, organizations, or persons, or their agents, or international terrorist organizations or activities."
"Counterintelligence Programs," Intelligence Community Directive 750, was signed by DNI James R. Clapper on July 5, 2013, and was released by the Office of the Director of National Intelligence in response to a Freedom of Information Act request.
http://www.fas.org/irp/dni/icd/icd-750.pdf
CI programs within the Intelligence Community are directed to address CI analysis, awareness and education, risk assessments, and critical asset protection.
A critical asset is "Any asset (person, group, relationship, instrument, installation, process, or supply at the disposition of an organization for use in an operational or support role) whose loss or compromise would have a negative impact on the capability of a department or agency to carry out its mission; or may have a negative impact on the ability of another U.S. Government department or agency to conduct its mission; or could result in substantial economic loss; or which may have a negative impact on the national security of the U.S."
By any reasonable definition, the Office of Personnel Management database of security clearance background investigations for federal employees and contractors that was recently compromised by a foreign adversary would appear to qualify as a "critical asset." But since OPM is not a member or an element of the Intelligence Community, it appears to fall outside the scope of this directive.
The IC Directive includes only the briefest of references to the sensitive topic of offensive counterintelligence, which involves penetrating, diverting and redirecting foreign intelligence efforts targeted at the United States:
"Effective mitigation of FIE [Foreign Intelligence Entity] activities involves anticipating, detecting, understanding, and assessing threats to national security and also taking appropriate CI actions to defeat, counter, neutralize, or exploit the threat."
* * * ODNI this week also released a 2012 instruction on the ORCON dissemination marking, referring to intelligence information whose distribution is "originator controlled.""The use of ORCON enables the originator to maintain knowledge, supervision, and control of the distribution of ORCON information beyond its original dissemination. Further dissemination of ORCON information requires advance permission from the originator."
However, its use should be limited. "The ORCON marking shall be applied judiciously in accordance with this ICPG to ensure that classified national intelligence is disseminated appropriately without undue delay or restriction."
"The decision to apply ORCON shall be made on a case-by-case basis using a risk-managed approach. It shall not be applied in a general or arbitrary manner." See "Application of Dissemination Controls: Originator Control," ICPG 710.1, July 25, 2012:
http://www.fas.org/irp/dni/icd/icpg710-1.pdf
HOW MANY DRONES FOR DOD?, AND MORE FROM CRS
The Department of Defense reportedly expects to increase its use of unmanned aerial systems ("drones") by nearly 50% in the next few years. At the same time, however, the rate of DoD's procurement of drones is projected to decline sharply from FY2016-2020.
The Congressional Research Service takes note of the seeming contradiction and proposes several possible explanations to resolve it.
See "How Many UAVs for DoD?", CRS Insights, August 27, 2015:
http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/natsec/IN10347.pdf
Other new and updated CRS publications that became public last week include the following.
Policy Implications of the Internet of Things, CRS Insights, August 25, 2015:
http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/IN10345.pdf
Health Insurance: Small is the New Large, CRS Insights, August 26, 2015:
http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/IN10346.pdf
Gold King Mine Spill May Renew Interest in "Good Samaritan" Legislation, CRS Insights, August 27, 2015:
http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/IN10348.pdf
Financial Regulatory Improvement Act Included in Senate Appropriations Bill, CRS Insights, August 27, 2015:
http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/IN10278.pdf
Terrorism Victims Sue to Enjoin Sanctions Relief under the Iran Nuclear Agreement, CRS Legal Sidebar, August 27, 2015:
http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/terror/enjoin.pdf
District of Columbia: A Brief Review of Provisions in District of Columbia Appropriations Acts Restricting the Funding of Abortion Services, updated August 27, 2015:
http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R41772.pdf
Drug Testing and Crime-Related Restrictions in TANF, SNAP, and Housing Assistance, updated August 28, 2015:
http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R42394.pdf
The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act's Essential Health Benefits (EHB), August 27, 2015:
http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R44163.pdf
Navy Ship Names: Background For Congress, updated August 26, 2015:
http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/weapons/RS22478.pdf
******************************
Secrecy News is written by Steven Aftergood and published by the Federation of American Scientists.
The Secrecy News blog is at:
http://fas.org/blogs/secrecy/To SUBSCRIBE to Secrecy News, go to:
http://fas.org/sgp/news/secrecy/subscribe.htmlTo UNSUBSCRIBE, go to:
http://fas.org/sgp/news/secrecy/unsubscribe.htmlOR email your request to saftergood@fas.org
Secrecy News is archived at:
SUPPORT the FAS Project on Government Secrecy with a donation here:
http://fas.org/sgp/news/secrecy/index.html
https://fas.org/donate/