SECRECY NEWS
from the FAS Project on Government Secrecy
Volume 2017, Issue No. 13
February 22, 2017Secrecy News Blog: https://fas.org/blogs/secrecy/
TWO VIEWS OF THE OPEN SKIES TREATY
Russian surveillance of military facilities under the Open Skies Treaty is problematic for the security of U.S. nuclear forces, a U.S. Air Force general told Congress last year. No, it is not, a U.S. Navy admiral said.
Those two disparate views were offered in response to a question for the record from Rep. Mike Coffman (R-CO) following a hearing of the House Armed Services Committee last year.
"Several Defense officials have expressed concerns about Russia's intent to use advanced digital sensors to collect imagery under the Open Skies Treaty," Rep. Coffman said. "Is this a significant concern for our nuclear forces?"
"Intelligence collection against our nuclear forces is always a concern," replied Gen. Robin Rand, commander of the U.S. Air Force Global Strike Command.
"The imaging system to be placed on the Tu-214 and Tu-154 is already in use on Russian aircraft flying Open Skies missions over Europe. The new system possesses greater range and an advanced digital processing capability, providing a significant increase in the number of images that can be collected. This digital capability, through post mission image refinement of raw image data, could potentially enable the Russians to violate the treaty by keeping the raw image data and later using advanced digital image enhancement techniques to refine resolution beyond that allowed in the treaty," Gen. Rand wrote.
But the same question from Rep. Coffman about the potential threat from improved Russian sensors elicited a substantially different response from VADM Terry Benedict, director of Navy Strategic Systems Programs.
"I do not believe this is a significant concern to our nuclear forces. The resolution of Open Skies imagery is similar to that available in commercial satellite imagery," VADM Benedict wrote.
Moreover, he added, "All State Parties have the right under the Treaty to certify new sensors and aircraft. The United States and several of our Allies are in various stages of acquiring new digital sensors. The information Russia gleans from Open Skies is of only incremental value in addition to Russia's other means of intelligence gathering."
The two responses serve to illustrate the inconvenient reality that many questions of national security policy do not have simple, unequivocal answers. Views that would seem to be authoritative may be contradicted by other assessments that are equally authoritative. Reconciling the contradiction, or overcoming it, requires further investigation. And even that may not be sufficient.
Rep. Coffman's exchange with Gen. Rand and VADM Benedict appeared (at page 105) in a hearing volume published last month on Fiscal Year 2017 Budget Request for Department of Defense Nuclear Forces, March 2, 2016, which also contains material of interest on nuclear weapons modernization programs, projected costs, and other policy matters.
https://fas.org/irp/congress/2016_hr/hasc-nuclear.pdf
Related issues were also discussed in another House Armed Services Committee hearing volume that was published last month. See U.S. Strategic Forces Posture, February 24, 2016.
https://fas.org/irp/congress/2016_hr/posture.pdf
A PRIMER ON THE EUROPEAN UNION, & MORE FROM CRS
How does the European Union work? Does the EU Have a foreign policy? What is the Schengen Area?
I don't know, but Kristin Archick of the Congressional Research Service does. See her newly updated report on The European Union: Questions and Answers, updated February 21, 2017:
https://fas.org/sgp/crs/row/RS21372.pdf
Other noteworthy new or updated publications from the Congressional Research Service include the following.
Nonstrategic Nuclear Weapons, updated February 21, 2017:
https://fas.org/sgp/crs/nuke/RL32572.pdf
U.S. Sanctions and Russia's Economy, updated February 17, 2017:
https://fas.org/sgp/crs/row/R43895.pdf
Iran: Politics, Human Rights, and U.S. Policy, updated February 17, 2017:
https://fas.org/sgp/crs/mideast/RL32048.pdf
Bahrain: Reform, Security, and U.S. Policy, updated February 14, 2017:
https://fas.org/sgp/crs/mideast/95-1013.pdf
Sanctuary Jurisdictions: Congressional Action and President Trump's Interior Enforcement Executive Order, CRS Insight, February 15, 2017:
https://fas.org/sgp/crs/homesec/IN10653.pdf
The DACA and DAPA Deferred Action Initiatives: Frequently Asked Questions, February 15, 2017:
https://fas.org/sgp/crs/homesec/R44764.pdf
Challenges for U.S. Policymakers in Latin America and the Caribbean, CRS Insight, February 16, 2017:
https://fas.org/sgp/crs/row/IN10654.pdf
U.S. Restrictions on Relations with Burma, updated February 7, 2017:
https://fas.org/sgp/crs/row/R44570.pdf
India's Natural Gas: A Small Part of the Energy Mix, February 13, 2017:
https://fas.org/sgp/crs/row/R44765.pdf
Japan-U.S. Relations: Issues for Congress, updated February 16, 2017:
https://fas.org/sgp/crs/row/RL33436.pdf
Current Ballistic Missile Defense (BMD) Issues, CRS Insight, February 21, 2017:
https://fas.org/sgp/crs/weapons/IN10655.pdf
******************************
Secrecy News is written by Steven Aftergood and published by the Federation of American Scientists.
The Secrecy News blog is at:
https://fas.org/blogs/secrecy/To SUBSCRIBE to Secrecy News, go to:
https://fas.org/sgp/news/secrecy/subscribe.htmlTo UNSUBSCRIBE, go to:
https://fas.org/sgp/news/secrecy/unsubscribe.htmlOR email your request to saftergood@fas.org
Secrecy News is archived at:
SUPPORT the FAS Project on Government Secrecy with a donation here:
https://fas.org/sgp/news/secrecy/index.html
https://fas.org/donate/